

The sleazy way in which campaigns and the political parties use loopholes in the campaign finance laws to evade responsibility for their attack ads is on full display in the Tennessee Senate race. Slick as a leer, pernicious as a virus, a campaign commercial transparently honed as a racist appeal to Tennessee voters has remained on the air, despite assurances from Republican sponsors that it was pulled down.Summarized by Copernic Summarizer
The ad is directed at Representative Harold Ford Jr., the Democratic candidate for the Senate, who is African-American. It includes a bare-shouldered white woman claiming to have met the candidate at a Playboy party and signing off with a close-up, whispered come-on: "Harold, call me."
The ad, resonating with the miscegenation taboos of Old South politics, may or may not be the nadir in the low-blow salvos now assailing the nation. But it takes the statuette for political hypocrisy as G.O.P. leaders insist they were hobbled by campaign law from cutting off what is clearly their own handiwork.
"We didn't have anything to do with creating it," insisted Ken Mehlman, the chairman of the Republican National Committee. All Mr. Mehlman's committee did was finance the ad by way of a supposedly "independent" political shop that serves as a shadow party operation specializing in attack ads on behalf of the Republican candidate, Bob Corker.
Mr. Corker eventually criticized the ad as tacky and not part of his campaign, asking that it be killed. But Republican assurances that it was finally off the air after days of damage have proved untrue, according to news reports. The 30-second fiction continued to air like some monstrous G.O.P. orphan.
Strategists from both political parties use the "independent" route of the campaign law for launching sleaze and disclaiming provenance.
Voters across the nation are hard-pressed to separate wheat from chaff in the whirlwind of political ads. But one of the few keys they have in figuring out who's responsible for something particularly egregious is the tag line required at each commercial's close.
In the anti-Ford ad, viewers transfixed by the blonde's vixenish sign-off may miss the commercial's only truly enlightening statement, tacked on in quick-talk: "The Republican National Committee is responsible for the content of this advertising."
The USA PATRIOT Act was signed into law by George W. Bush on October 26, 2001 – five years ago. At the time, many of us recognized it as the beginning of an enormous erosion of Bill of Rights protections. Though we didn’t know it at the time, President Bush had begun dismantling the Bill of Rights weeks earlier when he approved the National Security Agency (NSA) warrantless wiretapping program. That program guts Fourth Amendment protections by circumventing the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which Congress enacted specifically to codify executive-branch spying
Soon after Congress returns from its election recess on November 9, it is expected to consider legalizing the warrantless wiretapping program and providing amnesty for the telecom companies who handed our call information to the government without first seeing warrants. Regardless of the election outcome, the President’s bid to legalize warrantless wiretapping will doubtless be considered. And once more, dirty tricks and unbridled executive power will come up for a vote by the same lame-duck Congressional representatives who recently voted to pass the Military Commissions Act.
So, what can we do?
The same thing we did in 2001 when the PATRIOT Act was passed. We continue to resist. We work against any warrantless wiretapping bill that legalizes the illegalities of the Bush White House. We appeal to Congress to stop this runaway executive excess. And we continue to resist laws that we know are unconstitutional.
The PATRIOT Act was a mammoth intrusion on the Bill of Rights, but that didn’t stop ordinary people from organizing in their communities. It didn’t stop public forums, rallies, marches, conferences, and other local events to bring the excesses of the Bush Administration to light. It didn’t stop hundreds of local, county and state resolutions from being passed opposing the PATRIOT Act and other post-9/11 Administration abuses of the Bill of Rights.
The story of how that local agitation and 408 resolutions have held ground for the Bill of Right is often untold, but needs to be repeated again and again so we can see how far we’ve come in these five years.
In 2001, only 67 members of Congress were willing to vote against the PATRIOT Act. Four and a half years later, in 2006, 184 members of Congress voted against the PATRIOT Act Reauthorization. In those intervening years, the House of Representatives twice passed bills by clear majorities that would have removed funding from crucial parts of the PATRIOT Act – the sneak and peek home search provision and the Section 215, the library/bookstore provision. Unfortunately, under threat of presidential veto neither of those bills passed the Senate – but the House votes are a clear mark of Congress taking note of grassroots work to defend the Bill of Rights.
We can also look back on the past five years and mark the pieces of repressive law the Bush Administration was not able to move through Congress, or fully activate.
Though parts of each of those programs have wormed their way into Administration policy in some form or another, neither was passed whole cloth by Congress. Barring the existence of any yet-unrevealed programs, the overall effect of each of those Orwellian proposals was seriously muted by public cries of outrage fostered by a grassroots civil liberties movement.
When our grassroots resolution effort began in late 2001, we hoped that by 2006 we would have successfully rolled back the PATRIOT Act and re-established the Bill of Rights as a hallowed and heeded part of our Constitution. But civil liberties veterans warned us even back then that our work would take years, and to complete that work, we would need stamina, drive, and commitment.
Following the passage of the Military Commissions Act in late September, there has been a renewed vigor from ordinary people throughout the country who are still committed to protecting our vanishing freedoms. Many are planning Veterans Day events to stir local outrage against sanctioned torture and the abolition of habeas corpus. Others are using Halloween as the day to mark the horrors of post-9/11 reality, as they costume themselves as the dead and tortured of the Bush Administration. Still others are organizing public forums, marches, rallies, and conferences to once again bring to light the excesses of an executive branch gorged on power.
There are also newly emerging resolutions. The San Francisco Board of Supervisors, the California Bar Association, the Hampton, CT City Council and the Alaska Native Brotherhood Camp 5 in Haines, Alaska represent new popular will expressed against warrantless wiretapping and against the Military Commissions Act.
As in 2001, ordinary people are not waiting for the courts to declare these Presidential actions and Congressional laws unconstitutional. We are organizing locally, and our work will ripple out nationally. The Bill of Rights Defense Committee
Hope Marston is west region organizer for the Bill of Rights Defense Committee. She has been organizing locally against infringements on the Bill of Rights since 2002, and working with local Bill of Rights groups west of the Mississippi since 2005.
The Super-Powered Gospel:
Evangelical Sabre-Rattling Doesn't Advance Global Understanding
by Will Braun
Published on Monday, October 23, 2006 by the Winnipeg Free Press (
The Grahams -- widely respected in Christian circles and beyond -- have consistently provided a visible, public symbol of the church's blessing of the
This may be good or bad, depending on your view of the
Franklin Graham, brandishing a tone not heard from his father, called Islam "a very evil and wicked religion" and, in the wake of 9-11, said the
To be clear about what Rev. Graham suggested for
Is that what the religious imagination has to offer the world?
Compare that with the Amish of Nickel Mines. When faced with senseless violence, they did not respond with righteous vengeance but reached out to the family of the man who killed their children, setting up trust funds for his kids. Confronted by unthinkable violence, they responded with unthinkable forgiveness and compassion.
For them, faith meant replacing the human impulse for fear and retaliation with something kinder and gentler.
Whether or not one believes in God, war or
Right up until his final sermon in
The point is not that religion should necessarily retreat from the public sphere. Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., Bishop Desmond Tutu and Gandhi all blended religion with fearless engagement in the public realm, but they did it in a way that brought people together and dissipated violence. Gandhi went so far as to say: "I am a Muslim and a Hindu and a Christian and a Jew and so are all of you."
Where are the religious leaders with the courage and breadth to make such a statement today?
Perhaps religion, at its seldom-seen best, should allow society to imagine the unimaginable -- like responding to evil with goodness and forgiving murders. Maybe the power of such actions can do more for our world than the superpower of religio-political might.
Will Braun is editor of Geez magazine and attends
© Copyright 2006
CONTACT: Center for Creative Voices in Media
Jonathan Rintels, Center for Creative Voices in Media, (202) 747-1712
WASHINGTON - October 23 - - - Misguided FCC media ownership policies harm competition, diversity of viewpoints, and localism -- the Commission's key policy goals in regulating media ownership -- and prevent the American public from receiving better broadcast television, the Center for Creative Voices in Media told the Commission in comments filed today.
"Former FCC Chairman Newton Minow once famously referred to television as a 'vast wasteland,'" says Jonathan Rintels, Executive Director of Creative Voices. "By harming competition, diversity of viewpoints, and localism, recent ill-considered FCC media ownership policies have had the unintended consequence of making that 'wasteland' vaster.
In its current media ownership proceeding, the Commission must reverse these policies and remedy these consequences, so that the public gets what all would agree is truly in the public interest -- better television.
"At the FCC's recent public hearing in Los Angeles, the Commissioners heard for themselves from every corner of the creative community, from writers to directors to actors to producers, as well as from their audience, the American public.
The opinions were unanimous: action to reverse the consolidation trend in television is pro-creative, and creativity is in the public interest. Network broadcasters have used their control over the public's airwaves to put their competitors -- independent producers -- out of business.
"General Electric's recent announcement that it would reduce or eliminate scripted programming on its NBC network in the 8-9 p.m. hour of primetime is particularly illustrative of the unintended harmful consequences of FCC policy changes that have had the practical effect of eliminating independently-produced programming from the public's airwaves.
Just two years ago, NBCs 8 p.m. hour block was home to Friends, a hugely popular hit produced by strong independent producers one of the few shows still running from the days when FCC policies properly protected the right of independents to access the network airwaves. Prior to that, NBC's 8 p.m. hour block was home to The Cosby Show, Family Ties, 3rd Rock From the Sun, Golden Girls, Diff'rent Strokes -- the list could go on and on -- all family-friendly shows, all produced by strong independent producers.
But with GE/NBC taking advantage of FCC rule changes to eliminate independent producers and take over for itself the production of programming, NBC's own in-house studio has developed and produced few successful 8 p.m. scripted shows.
Could anything more starkly illustrate how solidly shut the network's doors are to programming from independent sources?
"Tim Winter, Executive Director of the Parents' Television Council, correctly observed at the Los Angeles FCC hearing that families and children benefit as much as anyone from a diverse media environment.
Groups like the PTC are not often on the same page as the creators they sometimes criticize. But it has become clear that family-friendly programming has a better chance of reaching audiences in a creative environment where competition, diversity of viewpoints, and localism exist, while crass, lowest common denominator programming is much more likely to proliferate in a consolidated media environment.
Contact: Trevor Fitzgibbon, 202-246-5303, or Alex Howe, or Laura Gross, 202-822-5200, for Fenton Communications
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=74796
News Advisory:
For the first time since the U.S. invasion of Iraq, active- duty members of the military are asking Members of Congress to end the U.S. occupation of Iraq and bring American soldiers home.
Sixty-five active-duty members have sent Appeals for Redress to Members of Congress. Three of these people (including two who served in Iraq) and their attorney will speak about this on Wednesday, Oct. 25 at 11 a.m. EDT.
Under the Military Whistle-Blower Protection Act (DOD directive 7050.6), active-duty military, National Guard and Reservists can file and send a protected communication to a Member of Congress regarding any subject without reprisal.
What: Three active-duty members of the military and their lawyer, a retired U.S. Marine Corps JAG, make comments and take questions from the media.
When: Wednesday, Oct. 25, 11 a.m. EDT
Conference Call Details: 800-362-0574, Conference ID: "Active Duty"
"Hear Me, everywhere. Wherever you have a question, simply know that I have answered it already. Then open your eyes to your world.My response could be in an article already published. In the sermon already written and about to be delivered. In the movie now being made.In the song just yesterday composed. In the words about to be said by a loved one. In the heart of a new friend about to be made.My truth is in the whisper of the wind, the babble of the brook, the crack of the thunder, the tap of the rain.It is in the feel of the earth, the fragrance of the lily, the warmth of the sun, the pull of the moon.My Truth, -- and your surest help in time of need -- is as awesome as the night sky, and is simply, incontrovertibly, trustful as a baby's gurgle.It is as loud as a pounding heartbeat -- and as quiet as a breath taken in unity with Me.I will not leave you, I cannot leave you, for you are My creation and My product, My daughter and My son, My purpose and My .. Self.Call on Me, therefore, wherever and whenever you are separate from the peace that I am.I will be there. With Truth, And Light. And Love."
a message from Joel & Victoria Osteen
Scripture
"But when the Friend comes, the Spirit of the Truth, he will take you by the hand and guide you into all the truth there is." (John 16:13)
Word from Joel and Victoria
God wants to help us make the right decision. He's there to warn us when we're about to make a mistake, or about to get into areas that are questionable and may bring us harm. It's just like an alarm clock going off in our conscience. He is that nervous feeling you get, that uneasiness we all hear telling us when we are about to do something that is not in our best interest. The Holy Spirit can speak through an inner feeling, an impression not in your head but in your heart. God speaks through your conscience and you can learn to hear His voice. The more time you spend with God the more you will be able to discern His voice guiding and directing you and leading you to a new level of joy and fulfillment.
A Prayer
God, when I spend time with You, I grow closer to You and learn to better hear Your voice. Thank You for giving us Your Spirit, that we may grow wiser. I will hear Your voice and I will obey it. In Jesus' name. Amen.
Never lose an opportunity of seeing anything that is beautiful;
for beauty is God's handwriting -- a wayside sacrament. Welcome
it in every fair face, in every fair sky, in every fair flower,
and thank God for it as a cup of blessing.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
by Ian Urbina |
Summarized by Copernic Summarizer
"Talk about panic," said Freddy Oakley, the county's top election official. "I've got gray-haired ladies as poll workers standing around looking stunned."
As dozens of states are enforcing new voter registration laws and switching to paperless electronic voting systems, officials across the country are bracing for an Election Day with long lines and heightened confusion, followed by an increase in the number of contested results.
In Maryland, Mississippi and Pennsylvania, a shortage of technicians has vendors for new machines soliciting applications for technical support workers on job Web sites like Monster.com. Oakley, who is also facing a shortage, raided the computer science department at the University of California, Davis, hiring 60 graduate students as troubleshooters.
Arizona, California, Georgia, Indiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio and Pennsylvania are among the states considered most likely to experience difficulties, according to voting experts who have been tracking the technology and other election changes.
"We've got new laws, new technology, heightened partisanship and a growing involvement of lawyers in the voting process," said Tova Wang, who studies elections for the Century Foundation, a nonpartisan research group. "We also have the greatest potential for problems in more places next month than in any voting season before."
Election officials in many of the states are struggling with delays in the delivery of machines before the election as old-fashioned lever and punch-card machines are phased out.
A chronic shortage of poll workers, many of them retirees uncomfortable with new technology, has worsened matters.
Wendy S. Noren, the top election official for Boone County, Mo., which includes Columbia, said delays in the delivery of new machines had left her county several weeks behind schedule and with 600 poll workers yet to be trained. Noren said she also had not yet been provided with the software coding she needed to print the training manuals. "I think we will make it," she said, "but my staff is already at the point of passing out, and the sprint is just starting."
New computerized registration rolls and litigation over new voter identification laws in states like Arizona, Georgia, Indiana and Missouri have left many poll workers and voters unclear about the rules, including whether they are in effect, as the courts have blocked many of the new laws.
"We're expecting arguments at the polls in these states that will slow everything down and probably cause large numbers of legitimate voters to be turned away or to be forced to vote on provisional ballots," said Barbara Burt, an elections reform director for Common Cause.
Meanwhile, votes in about half of the 45 most competitive Congressional races, including contests in Florida, Georgia and Indiana, will be cast on electronic machines that provide no independent means of verification.
"In a close race, a machine error in one precinct could leave the results in doubt and the losing candidates won't be able to get a recount," said Warren Stewart, policy director for VoteTrustUSA, an advocacy group that has criticized electronic voting.
Deborah L. Markowitz, president of the National Association of Secretaries of State, was less inclined to sound the alarm. She said that since it was not a presidential election year and many states had encouraged voting by mail, fewer people would turn up at the polls than in 2004.
Markowitz said, there will be far fewer people incorrectly excluded from the new databases compared with when registration rolls were on paper. "There will be isolated incidents, there is no doubt about that," she said. "But over all the system will move faster and with fewer problems."
Charles Stewart, head of the political science department at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, published a study this year indicating that from 2000 to 2004, new technology helped reduce the number of improperly marked ballots by about one million votes. "If you think things are bad and worrisome now, they were much worse before 2000," Mr. Stewart said, adding that breakdowns in the mechanics of voting are simply more highlighted, not more prevalent.
Still, this is a year of firsts for some local election officials.
Cherie Poucher, elections director for Wake County, N.C., which includes Raleigh, said she expected 350,000 voters on Election Day, up from the 30,000 in the May primary. She worries that the county's 218 optical scan machines may be unable to handle the increased load.
The machines were replaced within hours, she said, and since her county uses optical scan machines rather than paperless machines, voters were able to deposit paper ballots into a ballot box until replacements arrived.
Justin Levitt, a lawyer with the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law, said that on election night his organization will be keeping particularly close watch on North Carolina, Florida and South Dakota, because of new voter registration databases there. These databases were intended to help streamline registration and decrease fraud, and they help political parties track potentially supportive voters.
In some states, however, the databases have blocked large numbers of eligible voters from joining registration lists. North Carolina, for example, requires that information provided by voters for registration forms match information in the motor vehicle or Social Security databases.
A report released last Thursday by the Century Foundation, Common Cause and the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights cited concerns that most states have only vague, if any, standards for voting machine distribution. There is no federal minimum for the ratio of voters to machines and there is wide variation in state standards.
Election officials in Ohio, which had some of the longest lines in 2004, passed a law this year setting the ratio at 1:175, the report said.
Keith A. Cunningham, director of the Allen County board of elections in Ohio and former president of the Ohio Association of Election Officials, said most counties were close to the ratio required by the law.
Find out with IAVA Action's new Congressional Ratings
Click here to see your legislators' official IAVA Congressional Rating.
We've tallied up every Congressional vote cast on IAVA issues (from armor to VA funding) for the last five years, crunched the numbers, and given every legislator a letter grade - the IAVA Congressional Rating.
Did your Senator get an A or an F? Click here to find out.
Take Action! These new ratings are the first-ever comprehensive guide to your legislators' performance on issues that affect the lives of the newest generation of troops and veterans, and their families. We need your help to spread the word!
As the war in Iraq continues to be the number one issue facing our country, it's more important than ever that Americans hold their representatives accountable for the choices in Washington that affect troops on the ground. Thanks for spreading the word.
Sincerely,
Paul Rieckhoff
Executive Director
Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America